<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why interviews go wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badlanguage.net/why-interviews-go-wrong/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/why-interviews-go-wrong</link>
	<description>Writing about writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LamarJ</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/why-interviews-go-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-605942</link>
		<dc:creator>LamarJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=80#comment-605942</guid>
		<description>Bad language has been a life saver.  I don&#039;t regularly interview people but I will have to start soon.  Matthew&#039;s posts have really given me a good structure with which to start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad language has been a life saver.  I don&#8217;t regularly interview people but I will have to start soon.  Matthew&#8217;s posts have really given me a good structure with which to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Stibbe</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/why-interviews-go-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-547420</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Stibbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=80#comment-547420</guid>
		<description>Kerry - that&#039;s a really interesting case where you are interested in how the members of a band interact during an interview. &quot;Some kind of monster&quot; interviews! :-)

It&#039;s interesting to hear about people&#039;s experiences when they work in parallel but similar fields.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerry &#8211; that&#8217;s a really interesting case where you are interested in how the members of a band interact during an interview. &#8220;Some kind of monster&#8221; interviews! <img src='http://www.badlanguage.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to hear about people&#8217;s experiences when they work in parallel but similar fields.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Dexter</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/why-interviews-go-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-547417</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=80#comment-547417</guid>
		<description>I have on occasion had more than one person interviews work well -- I interview a lot of musicians, and sometimes talking with a duo, or two people who&#039;ve worked together on a project, makes sense and their interactions can be interesting. Still, I&#039;d prefer to speak one on one, and like Matthew, I transcribe interviews in full, and agree  that with more than one person it&#039;s sometimes a real challenge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have on occasion had more than one person interviews work well &#8212; I interview a lot of musicians, and sometimes talking with a duo, or two people who&#8217;ve worked together on a project, makes sense and their interactions can be interesting. Still, I&#8217;d prefer to speak one on one, and like Matthew, I transcribe interviews in full, and agree  that with more than one person it&#8217;s sometimes a real challenge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry B.</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/why-interviews-go-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-477901</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=80#comment-477901</guid>
		<description>I liked Matthews comments, but also Alex&#039;s.

Thanks a lot you guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Matthews comments, but also Alex&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot you guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Blyth</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/why-interviews-go-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-40764</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Blyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=80#comment-40764</guid>
		<description>Matthew makes some really good points here. I especially agree with what he says about two interviewees being worse than one - it never works out.

I&#039;m also a freelance journalist and find it really disappointing when an interview doesn&#039;t go as well as it should. This is because I only agree to interview people who I think will say something very interesting and directly relevant. I therefore look forward to the interviews and get frustrated when someone hasn&#039;t thought about what they are going to say beforehand, or doesn&#039;t turn up, or is using a mobile phone. 

However, for me the single greeatest reason why interviews fail is that a remarkable number of interviewees fail to listen to the question they&#039;re being asked. Frequently company spokespeople have a line they&#039;ve rehearsed and they&#039;re detemrined to get it out regardless of whether or not it has anything to do with what I&#039;ve asked. Others just seem to fundamentally misunderstand the nature of a conversation, seeing it more as an opportunity to externalise their internal ramblings. In both cases it&#039;s a waste of everyone&#039;s time as what they say won&#039;t be relevant to my article and I won&#039;t use it.  

As Matthew says, interviews should be intense, natural conversations where experts are sharing their skills and knowledge. When they work well they&#039;re great; when they don&#039;t they&#039;re incredibly frustrating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew makes some really good points here. I especially agree with what he says about two interviewees being worse than one &#8211; it never works out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also a freelance journalist and find it really disappointing when an interview doesn&#8217;t go as well as it should. This is because I only agree to interview people who I think will say something very interesting and directly relevant. I therefore look forward to the interviews and get frustrated when someone hasn&#8217;t thought about what they are going to say beforehand, or doesn&#8217;t turn up, or is using a mobile phone. </p>
<p>However, for me the single greeatest reason why interviews fail is that a remarkable number of interviewees fail to listen to the question they&#8217;re being asked. Frequently company spokespeople have a line they&#8217;ve rehearsed and they&#8217;re detemrined to get it out regardless of whether or not it has anything to do with what I&#8217;ve asked. Others just seem to fundamentally misunderstand the nature of a conversation, seeing it more as an opportunity to externalise their internal ramblings. In both cases it&#8217;s a waste of everyone&#8217;s time as what they say won&#8217;t be relevant to my article and I won&#8217;t use it.  </p>
<p>As Matthew says, interviews should be intense, natural conversations where experts are sharing their skills and knowledge. When they work well they&#8217;re great; when they don&#8217;t they&#8217;re incredibly frustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Language / Why good writers (occasionally) produce bad copy?</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/why-interviews-go-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-35540</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Language / Why good writers (occasionally) produce bad copy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 08:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=80#comment-35540</guid>
		<description>[...] Bad Interviews [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bad Interviews [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Media Interview &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When media interviews go wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/why-interviews-go-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>The Media Interview &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When media interviews go wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=80#comment-705</guid>
		<description>[...] Matthew Stibbe - writer-in-chief at Articulate Marketing and Editor of ModernPilot.com - has a nice summary of what can make a media interview go wrong, from the interviewer&#8217;s standpoint and the interviewee&#8217;s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matthew Stibbe &#8211; writer-in-chief at Articulate Marketing and Editor of ModernPilot.com &#8211; has a nice summary of what can make a media interview go wrong, from the interviewer&#8217;s standpoint and the interviewee&#8217;s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
