The blog divide
Steve Clayton cited BadLanguage.net in a recent post and put me on his blog roll. Any blog that links to Bad Language is a good blog. The post is about the value of blogs as a news source:
[M]uch of what I read and where I source my news is no longer from big publishers. I get my news fix from blogs almost entirely.
He perceives them as less biased, more authoritative and more humorous (apparently this is where I come in).
He ends with a question: how do you prioritise fifty blogs? This is a good, important question. I think the answer has something to do with headline writing and other techniques from journalism.
My question is: if only 4% of internet users ‘get’ RSS, as I read somewhere, is there a blog divide between a techno-elite and the rest of the population? What are the implications of this? Are we just playing with our toys or are the others missing out on something crucial?


stevecla wrote:
sigh…you’re so much better at writing eye catching headlines than me. Why didn’t I think of the blog divide?
Lets hope our little orange RSS friend start’s getting some more airtime. How long before we see a BBC TV program with an RSS icon and URL in the credits I ask myself.
Posted on 26-Mar-06 at 2:09 am | Permalink