Gadget review: Siri for couch potatoes

by Matthew Stibbe on November 20, 2011

Windows Media Remote Control, Media Center Remote Control, Voice Activated Remote Control.

One of the nice things about running a business like Turbine is that I get to talk to company owners and managers. We have a few hundred users now and so it’s like a little, exclusive social network.

I think it is the same motivation that took me into business journalism a decade ago and into B2B marketing with Articulate. The great thing about meeting people is meeting people!

I’m also a big fan of Windows Media Center. (Full disclosure: Microsoft is an Articulate client but I pay for my own PCs!) I have an Acer in the sitting room, a Hush silent PC in my home cinema and I use WMC on my office desktop to watch DVDs.

One of Turbine’s customers is Amulet Devices. They make a WMC remote control that has built-in voice recognition and they kindly sent me one to play with.

Voice recognition means that you can say things like “Watch Channel NBC” or “Play Artist U2” and your Media Center PC responds. It’s like Siri for coach potatoes. Check out this video:

YouTube Preview Image

It’s available in the US, Australia and New Zealand for $149. You’ll probably also want an IR receiver if your PC doesn’t have one built-in. That’s an extra $15. It’s a lot of fun and highly recommended.

If you like this article, please share it!

    { 0 comments }

    I love OB10, it’s the best way to invoice anyone

    by Matthew Stibbe on November 10, 2011

    A few years ago, I had a bad experience with OB10 but they’ve been making a lot of effort to improve their service and customers support and I have to say that since my original rant, the whole thing has worked very well. In my original post, I invited OB10 to comment. Their new CEO, Luke McKeever, got in touch, we have had a few positive conversations and he has written this guest post in response.

    imageBefore becoming CEO at OB10 seven months ago, my research on the company soon led me to Matthew’s blog and the feedback shared here. The sense of frustration and anger was clear, and even though the post was written a few years ago and has been closed to comments for 18 months, I’m sure that some of these feelings have not completely disappeared.

    I contacted Matthew to ask if he would reopen the comments so that I could add some recent thoughts, and he has kindly agreed to do so.

    I want to acknowledge that we needed to make improvements and share how your comments continue to influence the enhancements we’re making to OB10’s services. I’d also like to offer anyone who is reading this and is experiencing issues a public channel that comes straight to me.

    OB10 processes many thousands of invoices every day on behalf of our customers around the world and we take this responsibility very seriously. We appreciate how irritating it must be if you’re having problems and you struggle to get the help you need. The support service at OB10 has made significant advances after receiving years of focused investment; however we still have some way to go.

    With that in mind, I would like to provide some insight into what we’ve been doing:

    • We’ve spent a lot of time identifying and fixing the root causes of the issues that have triggered the highest number of support requests. We continue to refine our processes to reduce the number of inbound questions (did you know that the most popular query is ‘when will I get paid’? This is not something that we can ultimately control but we can help you find that information in a timely fashion)
    • We’ve shortened our response times and will reduce this further in the coming months
    • We’re also reviewing the messages that our system creates to ensure that they are meaningful and helpful to you
    • In the near future our new web portal will not only make the invoice process simpler and more engaging, it will also include a number of new features to provide greater value to our customers and feature new feedback channels that offer real-time responses

    If you’re a regular user, we hope you’ve started to notice the differences these investments are making. There are more in the pipeline. We’ll be sending updates to users directly or you can learn more from our website and blog.

    I joined OB10 for many reasons: we have an exceptional business, dedicated and passionate people, and many highly satisfied customers. The vast majority of the thousands of our customers who responded to our survey earlier this year said that they receive value from their use of the OB10 service. We want that percentage to continue to rise.

    We will stay focused on two things:

    1. Continuing to improve customer satisfaction by increasing investment in our people, processes and systems
    2. New services to enhance your experience and the benefits you receive

    Our vision is to become the most recommended global trading network and we plan to get there one step at a time. One of the ways we will achieve this is by listening to our customers.

    I want to keep this conversation going. I’ve created this post on the OB10 blog where you can add your comments and I can respond.

    Please tell me what we can do to meet and exceed your expectations.

    If you like this article, please share it!

      { 1 comment }

      10 myths about productivity

      by Matthew Stibbe on November 4, 2011

      iStock_000014218993XSmall

      Yes, another guest post from my Turbine blog. It’s still me, though!

      When it comes to productivity, a lot of people think a lot of crazy things. Some of these crazy people are managers in big companies. Others are, well, you and me. In many cases these foolish ideas have been comprehensively debunked by research.

      Anyhow, here are a few of the most pervasive myths. I think I still half-believe some of them myself:

      • Adding more people will help. Adding more people to a late project will make it later. This is the fundamental lesson from Fred Brooks’s book The Mythical Man-Month. Why? The more people, the more communication. The more communication, the less work. One of the things he advises is that if you can buy software ‘off the shelf’ rather than develop it, do so. It’s usually cheaper to adapt the organisation to the software than vice versa. Certainly this is our thinking with Turbine*.
      • Measuring inputs is the same as achieving outputs. Managers love metrics and it’s a lot easier to quantify the number of hours someone works than to measure the quantity, quality and value of their output. This is why most people get paid by the hour or by the day. What gets measured gets done. So if you pay for inputs, you’ll get lots of inputs. The big insight I had when I started my other business, Articulate Marketing, was to charge for copywriting on a per-word rather than a per-day basis. In other words, I charge by results not effort. It’s a big incentive for me to be more productive  but it’s also much more transparent and measurable for my clients.
      • A kick in the ass will help. Fredrik Herzberg nailed this myth decades ago in his Harvard Business Review classic, One more time, how do you motivate employees. This is really a must-read article. The point is that what pisses employees off is not the same as the stuff that motivates them. So focus on that: self-direction, responsibility, recognition, development, progress, respect. It’s self-evident, really. Would you work harder for a boss who just berated you all the time and told you to work harder or a boss who understood your abilities and helped you be your best?
      • Incentives help. Will people work harder if you promise them a bonus for timely deliver? Probably not. Or at least, it needs to be a big enough number (>25% of salary, typically) to incentivise people to work longer hours which (see above) is not the same as being more productive. The flip side is that once someone realises that they’re not going to make the deadline and get the bonus, you’ve effectively disincentivised that person to the value of the bonus they won’t get any more.
      • Meetings are the same as work. Sometimes you need to get consensus, coordinate action, reach collective decisions and share information. So meetings look like a good way to do this. But in truth they’re usually not. Actually, because of phenomena like risky shift, you can end up with worse results from a meeting than otherwise. Or you end up doing what the boss says anyway. Or you do your email and don’t listen to what other people are saying.
      • Busy is the same as productive. I could spend the whole day reading Twitter and blog posts. I’m definitely busy but I’m not productive. The same understanding extends to all kinds of office activities. It’s about doing the right thing and not just doing things right.
      • Buzzy is busy. Noisy, open-plan offices undermine productivity. It’s very hard to concentrate with too much background noise. Interruptions destroy focus. Buzzy is great in a restaurant or bar but there’s a reason they don’t let people talk in libraries. Peopleware has great data about the value of quiet rooms, noise reduction and eliminating interruptions.
      • Buying a book will help. There are some interesting books on productivity, including Getting Things Done and Seven Habits of Highly Effective People for individuals and Peopleware for businesses. However, just buying and reading the books isn’t enough. You have to test the ideas to see if they work for you. Don’t take a self-proclaimed guru’s’ word for it. Or mine.
      • You can run a business in four hours a week. I can’t even run my blogs in four hours a week. Tim Ferriss popularised some useful ideas like personal outsourcing and an idiosyncratic version of the Lean Startup (which I found much more useful). But at the end of the day, you’re kidding yourself if you think you can run a successful business in four hours. 40 perhaps. Like many ‘gurus’, I’m sure he makes more money preaching than practising and I’m not envious of his publishing success. At all. No. Not me.

      * One of the inspirations behind Turbine was spending a month in a client’s office where they had a team of expensive programmers and consultants implementing an in-house HR system. My ambition for Turbine was to give companies the same capabilities at a tiny fraction of the cost.

      Obviously, here at Turbine, we believe that automating routine paperwork can help make people more productive. By reducing the amount of time spent on pointless paperwork, we automatically liberate people to do something more fruitful.

      If you like this article, please share it!

        { 3 comments }

        The half life of a Tweet

        by Matthew Stibbe on November 3, 2011

        Bitly looked at the half-life of 1,000 popular links and found a mean half life of 2.8 hours for a Tweet and 3.2 hours for Facebook post. (YouTube videos have a half life of 7.4 hours.) A half life in this context means “the amount of time at which this link will receive half of the clicks it will ever receive after it’s reached its peak.”halflife_density

        If you like this article, please share it!

          { 0 comments }

          Scoop: HP Slate 2 unboxing and review video

          by Matthew Stibbe on November 3, 2011

          Last week I got a sneak preview of the new HP Slate 2 tablet. It’s pretty cool – it weighs just over a pound and runs Windows 7. If the iPad 2 is like a big magazine in size, the Slate 2 is more like a big paperback. With a USB or Bluetooth keyboard it could be a good writer’s portable. Unlike the iPad, it comes with a stand and a case. Anyhow, here’s my exclusive unboxing video. I think I may be the first person to have reviewed it! (Given that, it’s not big surprise that HP is a client at Articulate Marketing.)

          YouTube Preview Image
          If you like this article, please share it!

            { 4 comments }

            How to be a faster writer

            by Matthew Stibbe on November 2, 2011

            iStock_000015244458XSmall

            Apparently William F. Buckley forced himself to write 250 words in 15 minutes; writing faster and faster like a sprinter nearing the tape. This anecdote is the start of a great article from Slate magazine about writers’ productivity.

            There’s an old story about James Joyce. One night he was in a pub with a friend. “I’ve only written seven words today,” said Joyce. The friend was surprised – this was a lot by Joyce’s standards. Noting his friend’s surprise, Joyce added “But I don’t know what order they go in.”

            Yes, writing is hard work. But are we worrying about this too much. Is there a short cut to faster writing? According to Michael Agger there may be:

            • Ann Chenoweth and John Hayes (2001) found that sentences are generated in a burst-pause-evaluate, burst-pause-evaluate pattern, with more experienced writers producing longer word bursts.
            • S. K. Perry reports that the promise of money has a way of stimulating writerly "flow." (Yes, I can confirm that this works for me.)
            • "Binge writing—hypomanic, euphoric marathon sessions to meet unrealistic deadlines—is generally counterproductive and potentially a source of depression and blocking," sums up the work of Robert Boice. (Also confirmed by personal experience.)
            • Try to limit your working hours, write at a set time each day, and try your best not to emotionally flip out or check email every 20 seconds. This is called "engineering" your environment.  (Yup!)
            • The research verifies that taking notes makes writing easier­—as long as you don’t look at them while you are writing the draft! (Hadn’t thought about this before but definitely a good tip.)

            At the highest level of writing, an author juggles the text, what they’ll say next and how an imagined reader will interpret what’s being written. “A highly skilled writer can simultaneously be a writer, editor, and audience,” says Agger.

            Personally, I think writer’s block might stem from an overdeveloped internal editor. He warns against flipping between writer and researcher or succumbing to the distraction of email and twitter. But wasn’t it Ernest Hemingway who said “The hardest thing about writing is that the fridge always needs cleaning”? If you need any more distraction, check out my post: 22 Ways to stay focused on writing.

            If you like this article, please share it!

              { 4 comments }

              Monday morning cup of brown joy

              by Matthew Stibbe on October 31, 2011

              When I say ‘Earl Grey’, you say ‘Yes please’. I’m on my third cup of the morning. Margaret’s Hope first flush Darjeeling, if you want to know. I’ve written about tea before (see: Tools for writing – a nice cup of tea)

              YouTube Preview Image
              If you like this article, please share it!

                { 0 comments }

                HP Blogging Video

                by Matthew Stibbe on October 30, 2011

                YouTube Preview Image
                If you like this article, please share it!

                  { 0 comments }

                  Why I’m awesome: the Dunning-Kruger effect

                  by Matthew Stibbe on October 29, 2011

                  I have finally found the explanation for irrational overconfidence and, perhaps, much of the hype and bombast on the internet: the Dunning-Kruger effect. (Not to be confused with the Müller-Fokker Effect.)

                  The original research says:

                  People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.

                  In short, people grossly overestimate their abilities and self-knowledge is a learnable and useful skill.

                  My question is: does knowing your limits help you overcome them better than blithely assuming they don’t exist?

                  (Thanks to Fencing Bear for tracking down the original article and to Tom at the Writer Underground for linking the concept to internet bozosity.)

                  If you like this article, please share it!

                    { 12 comments }

                    Meetings are the opposite of work

                    by Matthew Stibbe on October 28, 2011

                    Business people working at meeting.

                    Besides Turbine, where this article first appeared, my other business is Articulate Marketing and we work with some of the world’s biggest companies, including Microsoft, HP and Symantec. The one thing I notice at all these companies is that people have diaries crammed with meetings; one after the other.

                    An early-rising friend of mine in a big company once said to me, “from six to nine, I work. From nine to six, I am worked.” I think this sums it up pretty well.

                    I think one of the reasons I get so much more done than other people is that I really try not to have meetings or, if I do, to have them on the phone or web video so I don’t have to spend time travelling. I’m also pretty good at concentrating.

                    Back in 2007, YouGov, the polling company, carried out a survey of 1,200 businesses in the UK and reported that unnecessary face-to-face meetings cost UK businesses £17 billion annually.

                    • 23 percent said that they could save 1-2 hours a week by not attending off-site meetings. 21 percent claimed 3-4 hours and 11 percent believing that 5-6 hours were at stake.
                    • Half of respondents said that they have to plan their work around external meetings.
                    • 67 percent travelled at least once a week for meetings.
                    • 82 percent believed that many of these meetings were unnecessary and could have been accomplished over the phone.
                    • Two thirds travel by car with obvious implications for carbon emissions.

                    Turbine exists to help people avoid wasting time on needless paperwork. But what’s the antidote to needless meetings?

                    If you like this article, please share it!

                      { 7 comments }