<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is PowerPoint really that bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badlanguage.net/is-powerpoint-really-that-bad/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/is-powerpoint-really-that-bad</link>
	<description>How to communicate</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PPT - Powerful Presentation Techniques</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/is-powerpoint-really-that-bad#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>PPT - Powerful Presentation Techniques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=264#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PowerPoint Attack ...&lt;/strong&gt;

Matthew Stibbe at BadLanguage has a post discussing whether PowerPoint is that bad. He argues that At worse it is an accomplice to the crime not the criminal. He provides links to various arguments pro and con for PowerPoint including...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PowerPoint Attack &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Matthew Stibbe at BadLanguage has a post discussing whether PowerPoint is that bad. He argues that At worse it is an accomplice to the crime not the criminal. He provides links to various arguments pro and con for PowerPoint including&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Van Sluys</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/is-powerpoint-really-that-bad#comment-1534</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Van Sluys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=264#comment-1534</guid>
		<description>Neill Archer Roan gives a lot of consideration to presenting in his blog at http://www.neillarcheroan.com/blog . It's really worth checking this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neill Archer Roan gives a lot of consideration to presenting in his blog at <a href="http://www.neillarcheroan.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.neillarcheroan.com/blog</a> . It&#8217;s really worth checking this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly Harkness</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/is-powerpoint-really-that-bad#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly Harkness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=264#comment-1524</guid>
		<description>Jean-luc Doumont also took issue with Tufte in the February 2005 issue of Technical Communication:  http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2005/00000052/00000001/art00008 ($10 download). 

If you ever get a chance to hear Jean-luc speak, do not pass it up. He uses PowerPoint effectively and his presentations are generally aimed at helping students and professional present information more effectively. His Web site is http://www.principiae.be/papers.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean-luc Doumont also took issue with Tufte in the February 2005 issue of Technical Communication:  <a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2005/00000052/00000001/art00008" rel="nofollow">http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2005/00000052/00000001/art00008</a> ($10 download). </p>
<p>If you ever get a chance to hear Jean-luc speak, do not pass it up. He uses PowerPoint effectively and his presentations are generally aimed at helping students and professional present information more effectively. His Web site is <a href="http://www.principiae.be/papers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.principiae.be/papers.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth W. Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/is-powerpoint-really-that-bad#comment-1523</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth W. Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=264#comment-1523</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Matthew, both for your own remarks and for the link to the Don Norman piece. You might also enjoy looking at a brief paper on Tufte and PowerPoint from my friends at Communication Partners: http://www.communipartners.com/articles_presentations.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Matthew, both for your own remarks and for the link to the Don Norman piece. You might also enjoy looking at a brief paper on Tufte and PowerPoint from my friends at Communication Partners: <a href="http://www.communipartners.com/articles_presentations.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.communipartners.com/articles_presentations.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partner Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/is-powerpoint-really-that-bad#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Partner Perspectives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=264#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A chat with Matthew in Tom's caf&#233;......&lt;/strong&gt;

I met with the writer of the Partner Update Magazine yesterday. We sat putting the world to right in......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A chat with Matthew in Tom&#8217;s caf&#233;&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I met with the writer of the Partner Update Magazine yesterday. We sat putting the world to right in&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/is-powerpoint-really-that-bad#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=264#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>Bad workman blaming his tools? No way can PowerPoint be drawn into or alongside any argument to apportion blame.

It is a tool and is a darned good product designed to assist speeches or presentation of data. The words and pictures displayed don't get onto a slide by way of magic. The presenter puts them there. So leave Powerpoint out of it. 

Focus anthing rotten with the speech or presentation where it belongs -  solely on the presenter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad workman blaming his tools? No way can PowerPoint be drawn into or alongside any argument to apportion blame.</p>
<p>It is a tool and is a darned good product designed to assist speeches or presentation of data. The words and pictures displayed don&#8217;t get onto a slide by way of magic. The presenter puts them there. So leave Powerpoint out of it. </p>
<p>Focus anthing rotten with the speech or presentation where it belongs -  solely on the presenter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
