Is it the Washington Post or The Onion?

by Matthew Stibbe on March 6, 2009

I loved this story in the Washington Post: Offbeat Name? Then Facebook’s No Friend. It’s a good story but it could have come straight out of The Onion.

Because after Caitlin Batman Shaw, a mental health therapist in Arlington, submitted the brief online form, she received an automated response rejecting her. The faceless gatekeepers of Facebook had decided her name could not possibly be real. Batman Shaw appealed, and was rejected. Appealed, rejected. "The process took me three weeks" and several e-mail queries, she says, before she was finally able to use her full legal name.

She can join the Yodas, the Christmases, the Beers, the Pancakes and all of the other wannabe Facebookers whose online rejections represent the latest in a lifetime of name shame. And really, what’s the point of Facebook if you can’t be yourself?

I have a difficult surname (for English-speakers, the Dutch and Germans do fine with it). Sometimes, I’d quite like to be called Batman, Super, Six, Christmas, Beer or even Pancake.

If you like this article, please share it!

    Related posts:

    1. If the Onion wrote the history of programming languages…
    2. The Onion on clichés
    3. From the "You couldn’t make it up" department
    4. Who gets your Twitter account when you die?

    { 3 comments… read them below or add one }

    Dan March 10, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Matt Emulsion? The list could go on…

    Reply

    Matthew Stibbe March 10, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Of course, there’s Matt Black as well but that’s already been taken.

    Reply

    Zach March 11, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    Wow–I’m surprised Facebook even filters more than obscenities.

    Reply

    Leave a Comment

    Previous post:

    Next post: