<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google vs. Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badlanguage.net/google-vs-microsoft/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/google-vs-microsoft</link>
	<description>How to communicate</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bad Language / First impressions of Google Spreadsheet</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/google-vs-microsoft#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Language / First impressions of Google Spreadsheet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=142#comment-226</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Google&#8217;s spreadsheet a) a flare to distract Microsoft, as Nicholas Carr believes, b) a trial balloon to see if there&#8217;s a lot of interest, c) a PR stunt, d) part of a longer-term strategy to evolve an online competitor to Microsoft&#8217;s Office System - this is what I believe and I have posted about this before. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Google&#8217;s spreadsheet a) a flare to distract Microsoft, as Nicholas Carr believes, b) a trial balloon to see if there&#8217;s a lot of interest, c) a PR stunt, d) part of a longer-term strategy to evolve an online competitor to Microsoft&#8217;s Office System - this is what I believe and I have posted about this before. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Stibbe</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/google-vs-microsoft#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Stibbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=142#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Well it is open to interpretation since we're doing more Kremlin watching than anything else, aren't we?

I saw a nice contradictory opinion on SVN (http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/google_flares.php) which basically asserts that these kinds of announcements are 'flares' designed to throw Microsoft of the scent.

I think Nicholas Carr's interesting blog makes a good point too.  I agree that Google aren't trying to resurrect Lotus 1-2-3 or some other standalone Excel-killer.  It's more that they're chopping Excel's legs off at the ankles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it is open to interpretation since we&#8217;re doing more Kremlin watching than anything else, aren&#8217;t we?</p>
<p>I saw a nice contradictory opinion on SVN (http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/google_flares.php) which basically asserts that these kinds of announcements are &#8216;flares&#8217; designed to throw Microsoft of the scent.</p>
<p>I think Nicholas Carr&#8217;s interesting blog makes a good point too.  I agree that Google aren&#8217;t trying to resurrect Lotus 1-2-3 or some other standalone Excel-killer.  It&#8217;s more that they&#8217;re chopping Excel&#8217;s legs off at the ankles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/google-vs-microsoft#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=142#comment-219</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure I completely agree, in the short-term at least.  I don't think google's short-term goal is to take over a portion of Microsoft's market share for office tools.  In the long term, that might be another story...

Have a look at Nicholas Carr's blog and see if you agree.  http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/06/googles_office.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I completely agree, in the short-term at least.  I don&#8217;t think google&#8217;s short-term goal is to take over a portion of Microsoft&#8217;s market share for office tools.  In the long term, that might be another story&#8230;</p>
<p>Have a look at Nicholas Carr&#8217;s blog and see if you agree.  <a href="http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/06/googles_office.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2006/06/googles_office.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
