<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book review: The Economist Style Guide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badlanguage.net/book-review-the-economist-style-guide/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/book-review-the-economist-style-guide</link>
	<description>How to communicate</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bad Language / How to make money writing for the web</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/book-review-the-economist-style-guide#comment-408312</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Language / How to make money writing for the web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=50#comment-408312</guid>
		<description>[...] a writer&#8217;s bookshelf. I recommend The Pyramid Principle, The Economist Style Guide, Writing to Deadline (also see my 10-minute summary of the book), Stephen King&#8217;s On Writing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a writer&#8217;s bookshelf. I recommend The Pyramid Principle, The Economist Style Guide, Writing to Deadline (also see my 10-minute summary of the book), Stephen King&#8217;s On Writing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Language / Economist style and business writing</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/book-review-the-economist-style-guide#comment-121924</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Language / Economist style and business writing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 09:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=50#comment-121924</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s more to The Economist&#8217;s style than the odd bit of fizz and ginger (see my review of their style guide, for example), but these examples show that there is room in serious, formal writing for the right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s more to The Economist&#8217;s style than the odd bit of fizz and ginger (see my review of their style guide, for example), but these examples show that there is room in serious, formal writing for the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Language / Geeks: how to write for a non-technical audience</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/book-review-the-economist-style-guide#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Language / Geeks: how to write for a non-technical audience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=50#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>[...] Get the syntax right. Check out the Economist Style Guide and The Elements of Style (Strunk and White) to learn how to write good, clean prose. These are like the Mythical Man Month – required reading. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Get the syntax right. Check out the Economist Style Guide and The Elements of Style (Strunk and White) to learn how to write good, clean prose. These are like the Mythical Man Month – required reading. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
