<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 more way to crack (blogger) writer&#8217;s block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badlanguage.net/10-more-way-to-crack-blogger-writers-block/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/10-more-way-to-crack-blogger-writers-block</link>
	<description>Writing about writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo</title>
		<link>http://www.badlanguage.net/10-more-way-to-crack-blogger-writers-block/comment-page-1#comment-195017</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badlanguage.net/?p=250#comment-195017</guid>
		<description>Interesting to note the way you wrote this title. That is something I would put in my list of things to avoid, but you should have a good reason to have made it this way. Let me explain.
The title says &quot;10 more way[s] to crack (blogger) writer’s block&quot;. This &quot;(blogger)&quot; gave me the initial impression that it was an alternative to &quot;crack&quot; instead of &quot;writer&quot;. That&#039;s because I usually see the alternative written after the word, never before.
Any special reason for putting it before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note the way you wrote this title. That is something I would put in my list of things to avoid, but you should have a good reason to have made it this way. Let me explain.<br />
The title says &#8220;10 more way[s] to crack (blogger) writer’s block&#8221;. This &#8220;(blogger)&#8221; gave me the initial impression that it was an alternative to &#8220;crack&#8221; instead of &#8220;writer&#8221;. That&#8217;s because I usually see the alternative written after the word, never before.<br />
Any special reason for putting it before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
